In a significant legislative move, the European Parliament voted in favor of the Omnibus bill, which includes controversial changes to the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). The vote, which concluded with 382 members supporting the bill and 249 opposing it, has drawn sharp criticism from various advocacy groups and stakeholders concerned about its implications for corporate accountability in relation to human rights and environmental standards.

The conservative European People’s Party (EPP), led by Jörgen Warborn, played a pivotal role in the passage of this bill, aligning with far-right party groups to push through deregulation measures. Critics argue that this coalition has compromised the integrity of the CSDDD, which was designed to ensure that businesses adhere to responsible practices in their global operations.

Olivia Nordell from Swedwatch expressed her dismay at the outcome, stating, “It’s a sad day for EU democracy – and for responsible business, human rights and environmental protection.” She highlighted that the removal of key provisions, such as requirements for climate transition plans, undermines the EU’s commitment to its international climate obligations under the Paris Agreement. The European Central Bank had previously emphasized the necessity of these plans for transforming the economy and enhancing the business sector’s contributions to climate goals.

Sponsors

Furthermore, the rejection of proposals for common rules on civil liability raises concerns about the ability of rights holders to seek compensation from corporations. This decision could lead to a fragmented legal landscape across the EU, where accountability mechanisms vary significantly from one member state to another, creating an uneven playing field for businesses operating within the internal market.

Nordell characterized the vote as a serious setback for workers’ rights and environmental protections, stating that it jeopardizes the EU’s climate ambitions. As attention now shifts to upcoming negotiations with the Council, set to begin next week, there are calls for member states and parliamentary negotiators to restore critical elements of the legislation. Stakeholders in Sweden are urged to closely monitor their government’s stance in these discussions to ensure that protections for workers and the environment are not further eroded.

The implications of this vote extend beyond immediate regulatory changes, as it reflects broader tensions within the EU regarding the balance between economic interests and social responsibility. As the legislative process continues, the outcomes will likely influence not only corporate practices but also the EU’s role in global efforts to promote sustainability and human rights.